City of Portland v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s denial of a continuance motion as a discovery “sanction” because “the state’s delay [in providing a police report] did not prejudice the preparation of defendant’s case”
• affirming the trial court’s denial of a continuance motion as a discovery “sanction” because “the state’s delay [in providing a police report] did not prejudice the preparation of defendant’s case”
• court assumed, without deciding, that the Oregon Criminal Code applied to Portland city ordinances
• not- ing that an officer’s statements that were the subject of late disclosure did not impact the defendant’s trial strategy and the officer’s participation in the incident was insignificant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).