City of Portland v. Fisherman's Wharf Associates II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no vested rights were acquired simply because the plaintiff acquired a building permit or spent money complying with regulations before the effective date
• “[I]f either a statute or an ordinance contains a provision of retroactivity, section 302’s rule of prospectivity is negated.”
• no vested right to develop property when title was taken with notice of proposed zoning change

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).