City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts should not exclude expert opinions ″merely because they are impeachable″ (quoting Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Grp., Inc., 738 F.3d 960, 969 (9th Cir. 2013))
• ruling that when an expert’s application of a reasonable methodology was merely “shaky,” it should not have been excluded, but rather admitted and subjected to attack by cross-examina- tion and contrary evidence
• stating that, under Daubert, “[t]he judge is supposed to screen the jury from unreliable nonsense opinions, but not exclude opinions merely because they are impeachable”
• noting that 19 “[s]haky but admissible evidence is to be attacked by cross examination, contrary evidence, and 20 attention to the burden of proof, not exclusion” (quotation omitted)
• stating that courts should not exclude expert opinions ″merely because they are impeachable″ (quoting Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Grp., Inc., 738 F.3d 960, 969 (9th Cir. 2013))
• stating that under Daubert, “[t]he judge is supposed 17 to screen the jury from unreliable nonsense opinions, but not exclude opinions merely because 18 they are impeachable” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).