City of Plainfield v. State Health Benefits Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “jurors are entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence based on their own common-sense understanding of the world”
• holding that “jurors are entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence based on their own common-sense understanding of the world”
• Jurors are “entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence based on their own common-sense understanding of the world.” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• jurors are entitled to draw reasonable inferences “based on their own common-sense understanding of the world” as “ordinarily prudent persons would make in light of their everyday experience and knowledge of human conduct and behavior” (cleaned up)
• jurors are entitled to draw reasonable inferences “based on their own common-sense understanding of the world” that “are ordinarily drawn by ordinary [people] in the light of their experience in everyday life” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “Where the jury is authorized to find the evidence sufficient to exclude every 15 reasonable hypothesis save that of the accused’s guilt, this Court will not disturb that finding unless it is insupportable as a matter of law.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).