· 6/22/1966
City of Phoenix v. Consolidated Water Company
Citations
- 415 P.2d 866
- 101 Ariz. 43
- 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the purpose behind requiring the trial court to make findings of fact is to enable an appellate court to examine the basis upon which the trial court relied in reaching its ultimate judgment
- \Proper findings are essential to enable [the appellate court] to perform its function of assuring that the findings support the judgment and that the evidence supports the findings.\
- “Proper findings are essential to enable [the appellate court] to perform its function of assuring that the findings support the judgment and that the evidence supports the findings.”
- agreeing but affirming the judgment
- agreeing but affirming the judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Struckmeyer, Bernstein, Udall, Lockwood, McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.