Skip to main content
· 3/8/1994

City of Phoenix v. Clauss

Citations

  • 869 P.2d 1219
  • 177 Ariz. 566
  • 160 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27
  • 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because a statute did not “constitute[ ] a ‘coercive influence’ upon the judiciary,” it did not unconstitutionally usurp judicial power
  • \objections to the validity of executory contracts affect the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility \
  • jury instructions must be supported by facts in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Contreras, Jacobson, Lankford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.