City of Philadelphia v. Clement & Muller, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain meaning of the phrase “notwithstanding a contrary provision of law of the Commonwealth ...” is “regardless of what any other law provides ... ”
• holding that the plain meaning of the phrase “notwithstanding a contrary provision of law of the Commonwealth ...” is “regardless of what any other law provides ...”
• holding that the plain meaning of the phrase “notwithstanding a contrary provision of law of the Commonwealth ...” is “regardless of what any other law provides ...”
• holding that the plain meaning of the phrase “notwithstanding a contrary provision of law of the Commonwealth ...” is “regardless of what any other law provides ...”
• holding that the plain -5- J-S15039-15, J-S15040-15, J-S15042-15, J-S15043-15 meaning of the phrase ‘notwithstanding a contrary provision of law of the Commonwealth ...’ is ‘regardless of what any other law provides ...’
• holding plain meaning of phrase “notwithstanding a contrary provision of law of the Commonwealth” is “regardless of what any other law provides”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).