City of Philadelphia v. A Kensington Joint, LLC & A. Ehrlich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that private conversation could be a protected “effect” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment
• observing that \intercept” under the Communications Act \indicates the taking or seizure by the way or before arrival at the destined place.”
• observing that \intercept\ under the Communications Act \indicates the taking or seizure by the way or before arrival at the destined place\
• observing that “intercept” under the Communications Act “indicates the taking or seizure by the way or before arrival at the destined place”
• evidence admissible where federal agents used detectaphone attached to wall of one room to overhear conversations in adjoining room
• evidence admissible where federal agents used detectaphone attached to wall of one room to overhear conversations in adjoining room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).