City of Petersburg v. Todd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding it is improper to disregard “the Congressional intent clearly expressed in the text simply by asserting that its preferred approach would be better policy”
• explaining that many statutory requirements for SIPs relate to the regulation of stationary sources
• “[If] scope of the authorization ... is clear in the statute, the scope of the implied preemption can be resolved at Chevron step one.”
• “there must be evidence that Congress meant something other than what it literally said before a court can depart from plain meaning”
• “The [agency’s] strongest arguments arise from an apparent tension between two aspects of the authorization regime.”
• \The [agency's] strongest arguments arise from an apparent tension between two aspects of the authorization regime.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).