City of Pensacola v. Stamm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that recreational use statute is not intended to apply to governmental entities already charged with responsibility of acquiring and maintaining recreational property for general welfare of citizens
• concluding that “section 375.251 is intended to encourage private persons and entities to open their private lands for public recreational use” and that “it is not intended to protect governmental entities already charged with that responsibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).