· 8/28/2009
City of Pasadena v. Smith
Citations
- 292 S.W.3d 14
- 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1087
- 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1171
- 2009 Tex. LEXIS 633
- 2009 WL 2667599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Asserting that a decision made by the hearing examiner is incorrect is not the same as asserting that the 9 examiner did not have jurisdiction.”
- observing that the nondelegation doctrine is “the Texas Constitution’s restrictions on the delegation of governmental power”
- noting that \judicial review of an arbitration award is usually very narrow\
- noting the Act requires the hearing examiner to base his decision on evidence submitted during a hearing
- hearing examiner is not authorized to make rules, but must follow those in the Act
- stating the hearing examiner “had no authority to impose on the City a requirement that the Act makes quite clear does not apply.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.