Skip to main content
· 8/28/2009

City of Pasadena v. Smith

Citations

  • 292 S.W.3d 14
  • 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1087
  • 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1171
  • 2009 Tex. LEXIS 633
  • 2009 WL 2667599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Asserting that a decision made by the hearing examiner is incorrect is not the same as asserting that the 9 examiner did not have jurisdiction.”
  • observing that the nondelegation doctrine is “the Texas Constitution’s restrictions on the delegation of governmental power”
  • noting that \judicial review of an arbitration award is usually very narrow\
  • noting the Act requires the hearing examiner to base his decision on evidence submitted during a hearing
  • hearing examiner is not authorized to make rules, but must follow those in the Act
  • stating the hearing examiner “had no authority to impose on the City a requirement that the Act makes quite clear does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.