City of Owensboro v. Skillman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[s]upplemental opinions must not include material changes or corrections to the expert opinions.”
• finding expert’s opinions on the “timing and sequence of the gunshot wounds” relevant to whether shooting officers were entitled to qualified immunity from excessive force claim
• \[T]he evidence supports Plaintiffs' argument that Cole did not know of the Officers' presence.\
• \Cole was shot before he had an opportunity to disarm himself.\
• “[T]he evidence supports Plaintiffs’ argument that Cole did not know of the Officers’ presence.”
• “[T]he evidence supports Plaintiffs’ argument that Cole did not know of the Officers’ presence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).