City of Orrville v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a party lacks standing to challenge denial of non-party's motion to intervene
• “Since plaintiffs lack standing to challenge [the agency’s] substantive actions, they indeed lack standing to challenge procedural defects in the process that produced those actions.”
• “Because [petitioner’s] preliminary permit expired before it petitioned for review, . . . its claims are properly disposed of on standing, rather than mootness, grounds.”
• “The text of [Rule 214] does not compel consider- ation of each of the factors. . . .”
• “‘Allegations of injury based on predictions regarding future legal proceedings are … too speculative to invoke the jurisdiction of an Article III Court.’”
• “Since plaintiffs lack standing to challenge [the agency’s] substantive actions, they indeed lack standing to -22- challenge procedural defects in the process that produced those actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).