City of Omaha, Nebraska Civilian Employees' Retirement System v. CBS Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to plausibly allege that the speaker did not truly hold that opinion
• noting that Section 10(b) and Section 11 claims “share a material misstatement or omission element”
• noting that Section 10(b) and Section 11 claims “share a material misstatement or omission element”
• noting that § 10(b) and § 20(a) claims both “share a material misstatement or omission element”
• stating that Fait’s “reasoning applies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the 1934 Act”
• stating that Fait's “reasoning applies under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the 1934 Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).