City of Olmsted Falls, Ohio v. Federal Aviation Administration and Department of Transportation, City of Cleveland, Ohio, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \arbitrary and capricious\ standard is applied to determine the adequacy of an EIS
• holding that the “arbitrary and capricious” standard is applied to determine the adequacy of an EIS
• holding that petitioners did not meet their burden of proof on whether a conformity determination was required by simply suggesting that it was an \open question\ whether the emissions limits would be exceeded
• holding that petitioners did not meet their burden of proof on whether a conformity determination was required by simply suggesting that it was an “open question” whether the emissions limits would be exceeded
• explaining that municipality had standing only because it showed injury to itself based on Clean Air Act requirements with which it had to comply
• acknowledging that the doctrine of parens patriae is a “theory of standing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).