Skip to main content
· 10/29/1993

City of Olathe v. Stott

Citations

  • 861 P.2d 1287
  • 253 Kan. 687
  • 1993 Kan. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the impact of environmental stigma on valuation of contaminated land in the context of eminent domain
  • specific statute controls over statutes that might deal with same subject matter in some general or incidental way
  • Kansas Storage Tank Act does not preempt general statutes regarding eminent domain; thus, evidence of contamination is admissible in an eminent domain proceeding involving a determination of the fair market value of property taken
  • Kansas Storage Tank Act does not preempt general statutes regarding eminent domain; thus, evidence of contamination is admissible in an eminent domain proceeding involving a determination of the fair market value of property taken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.