· 5/20/1996
City of Oakland v. Superior Court
Citations
- 45 Cal. App. 4th 740
- 53 Cal. Rptr. 2d 120
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 5773
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3559
- 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a similar “Deemed Approved” program for liquor stores on the ground that “[a] municipality retains the right to abate nuisances and enforce its criminal laws even in the face of grandfather rights”
- \[T]he sheer magnitude of the case makes the disposition of these issues crucial as several hundred litigants are waiting for a decision before proceeding with their cases.\
- “A municipality retains the right to abate nuisances and enforce its criminal laws even in the face of grandfather rights.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reardon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.