CITY OF OAKLAND, CAL. v. Hotels. Com LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying California exhaustion requirements, where claims related to state law and procedure
• affirming dismissal but remanding to dismiss without prejudice
• “Defendant’s 9 interpretation would mean that if the employee first turned to the wrong agency even with a meritorious claim, that employee could be discharged before he was eventually directed to the EEOC. Such an interpretation would undercut the purposes of section 704.”
• affirming dismissal but remanding to dismiss without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).