· 3/28/1985
City of North Miami v. Miami Herald Pub. Co.
Citations
- 468 So. 2d 218
- 10 Fla. L. Weekly 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that state public records act does not exempt communications between attorneys and governmental clients, except during pendency of litigation
- reiterating that only the legislature can create such an extended exemption
- in construing legislation, it should not be assumed that the Legislature acted pointlessly or enacted meaningless legislation
- in construing legislation, it is not assumed that the Legislature acted pointlessly or enacted useless legislation
- communications between attorney and government-entity client belong to the client, not the lawyer
- s. 90.502 , F.S., which establishes an attorney-client privilege for public and private entities, does not remove communications between an agency and its attorney from the open inspection requirements of Ch. 119 , F.S.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.