Skip to main content
· 3/28/1985

City of North Miami v. Miami Herald Pub. Co.

Citations

  • 468 So. 2d 218
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that state public records act does not exempt communications between attorneys and governmental clients, except during pendency of litigation
  • reiterating that only the legislature can create such an extended exemption
  • in construing legislation, it should not be assumed that the Legislature acted pointlessly or enacted meaningless legislation
  • in construing legislation, it is not assumed that the Legislature acted pointlessly or enacted useless legislation
  • communications between attorney and government-entity client belong to the client, not the lawyer
  • s. 90.502 , F.S., which establishes an attorney-client privilege for public and private entities, does not remove communications between an agency and its attorney from the open inspection requirements of Ch. 119 , F.S.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.