City of Newport v. Zimmerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Dr. Ficca also asks that I reconsider the finding that Borrell had a protected property interest in the continuation of her study in the NAP.”
• “In order to satisfy the ‘stigma’ prong, a [student] must show . . . that the [public] statement was substantially and materially false.”
• “Borrell was informed of her dismissal from the NAP by letter on joint Bloomsburg-Geisinger stationary. That letter reflects Dr. Ficca’s agreement with the decision to terminate Borrell from the NAP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).