· 1/22/1909
City of Newport v. Fitzer
Citations
- 131 Ky. 544
- 115 S.W. 742
- 1909 Ky. LEXIS 46
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “But even if the arbitration agreements were contracts of adhesion that would not mean that they are procedurally unconscionable. Contracts of adhesion are not per se unenforceable.”
- “[E]ven if the arbitration 12 agreements were contracts of adhesion that would not mean that they are procedurally 13 unconscionable. Contracts of adhesion are not per se unenforceable.”
- “Similarly here, the confidentiality provision in the arbitration agreements 26 keep only plaintiffs in the dark regarding prior arbitration decisions and only defendants 27 would benefit from this provision.”
- take-it-or-leave-it contracts 13 are not automatically procedurally unconscionable in Arizona
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Settle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.