· 12/23/2008
City of New York v. Milhelm Attea & Bros., Inc.
Citations
- 591 F. Supp. 2d 234
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103871
- 2008 WL 5401597
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a motion for reconsideration is not “‘an occasion for repeating old arguments previously rejected’”
- finding that a motion for reconsideration is not “‘an occasion for repeating old arguments previously rejected’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.