City of New York v. Group Health Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding undue delay where plaintiff sought leave to amend during summary judgment briefing but “was aware of the flaws in its complaint” several years earlier
• finding no error in district court’s failure to consider an expert report that was irrelevant to its decision
• denying leave to amend when leave was sought three years into the case, after filing of motions for summary judgment
• rejecting a market defined by the City of New York’s preferences for health insurance providers that ignored the larger competition among in surance providers for the City’s business
• “A single purchaser’s preferences . . . cannot define a market.”
• “A single purchaser’s preferences . . . cannot define a market.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).