City of New Orleans v. Rousseau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]nconsistent verdicts, whether from judge or jury, provide no grounds for reversal of a conviction.
• “[T]he long standing rule is that ‘the fact-finders may believe one part of witness’ testimony and disbelieve an- other.’ Moreover inconsistent verdicts, whether from judge or jury, provide no grounds for reversal of a conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).