City of New Orleans v. Robira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to whatever extent contribution or indemnification were even allowed, it would only make sense in a case involving contribution from co-defendants or third parties responsible in part for the violation”
• “The FHA penalizes actions that, in any way, ‘make unavailable’ any dwelling to any person ‘because of race, sex, familial status, or national origin.’” (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a))
• “The FHA penalizes actions that, in any way, ‘make unavailable’ any dwelling to any person ‘because of race, sex, familial status, or national origin.’” (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a))
• “to whatever extent contribution or indemnification were even allowed, it would only make sense in a case involving contribution from co-defendants or third parties responsible in part for the violation”
• “The FHA is ‘a detailed housing law, applicable to a broad range of discriminatory practices and enforceable by a complete arsenal of federal authority.’” (quoting Jones v. Alred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 417 (1968)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).