City of New Orleans v. Rinaldi
Citations
- 105 La. 183
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The legality and constitutionality of the ordinance attacked alone are at issue.</p> <p>2. The act denounced by the City Council has the sanction of several statutes.</p> <p>3. The defendant does not appeal from the asserted notice, but from the judgment which was afterwards rendered.</p> <p>4. If the notice be illegal, it was not the basis of the judgment appealed from; which was rendered on an affidavit and after hearing witnesses.</p> <p>5. While it is desirable that an affidavit initiating a proceeding such as was instituted should specify the particulars constituting the charge brought, it may yet be held sufficient if it sets forth the ordinance and the particular section violated.</p> <p>6. While a subpoena applied for should issue, if, on appeal, it appears that the testimony of the witnesses would not in any manner have served to sustain defendant’s theory, the judgment will not be annulled.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is 10 sufficient that ‘constitutional claims may be raised in state-court judicial review of the 11 administrative proceeding.’”
- “By failing to respond to the County’s contention, Plaintiffs have effectively conceded its validity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bbeaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.