City of New Orleans v. Germania Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party could not quash third-party subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) where it “d[id] not explain how these subpoenas will result in annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or an undue burden or expense to him” (internal brackets and quotation marks omitted
• finding “no cases . . . that depart from this general rule”
• requiring party to challenge non-party subpoena via motion to quash

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).