City of Moultrie v. Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in case alleging that fire that damaged the plaintiff’s property was caused by the defendant city’s negligence, that the notice documents did not substantially comply with OCGA § 36-33-5 (b) because they did not “indicat[e] that the fire was caused by the city’s negligence”
• notice was insufficient where plaintiff contends the alleged negligence was contained within the statement that a power line maintained by the city fell, causing a fire, but the notice did not allege how the City was negligent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).