Skip to main content
· 12/21/1909

City of Mobile v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Citations

  • 174 F. 1020
  • 98 C.C.A. 663
  • 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5284

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that the defendants were estopped from challenging the constitutionality of a statute because they had accepted \the monetary benefits\ of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foster, Pardee, Shelby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.