City of Miami v. Tomberlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although claimant was aware of lung and hearing injuries caused by exposure to noise and pollution at work as early as 1970, his 1984 claim was not barred by the statute of limitations, because his injuries resulted from ongoing exposure when he filed the claim
• “hazard” prong met by showing of regular exposure to common but excessive downtown noise and air pollution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).