Skip to main content
· 7/3/1995

City of Miami v. Thomas

Citations

  • 657 So. 2d 927
  • 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7287
  • 1995 WL 387176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting assertion by employer/carrier that disability giving rise to section 112.18 presumption must be permanent
  • this Court rejected the JCC’s finding that the term “hypertension” as used in section 112.18, was meant to include “any kind of hypertension”
  • “We ... reject the City’s argument that ... section 112.18[ ] was intended to be limited to permanent disability, so that the presumption would not apply to a temporary disability, as experienced by this claimant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.