City of Miami v. Pellegrino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \parental rights are not preserved\ by waiting for a more \convenient\ or \suitable\ time for the parent while others perform their duties
• stating that \parental rights are not preserved\ by waiting for a more \convenient\ or \suitable\ time for the parent while others perform their duties
• concluding the orphans’ court abused its discretion in determining that termination served the needs and welfare of 15- and 13-year-old children in part because of the children’s preferences to reunify and reluctance to consent to adoption
• vacating the order terminating the mother’s parental rights even though the father’s parental rights were terminated and he did not appeal
• vacating the order terminating the mother’s parental rights even though the father’s parental rights were terminated and he did not appeal
• in a termination of parental rights case, recognizing that the subject children, who were thirteen and fifteen years old, “need to consent to adoption at this point.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).