City of Maryland Heights v. State of Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Fourth Amendment case law and stating that, under Article I, section 9, police activities that exceed what is reasonably necessary to effectuate the investigation require an independent constitutional justification
• “Although an error occurred in the trial court, we will affirm if there is little likelihood that the particular error affected the verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• where unchallenged tes- timony already made clear that defendant was not being entirely truthful or forthright, statement implicated by the trial court’s error that could support the same inference was cumulative
• in evaluating whether evidentiary error was Cite as 373 Or 213 (2025) 237 harmless, looking to whether the parties’ arguments com- municated that erroneously admitted statements “were not considered significant by either party”
• in evaluating whether evidentiary error was Cite as 373 Or 213 (2025) 237 harmless, looking to whether the parties’ arguments com- municated that erroneously admitted statements “were not considered significant by either party”
• identify- ing that ground for not reaching a plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).