City of Marietta, Georgia v. Ray D. Summerour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “leave of court” requirement “is primarily intended to protect the defendant against prosecutorial harassment”
• stating that the initial version of Rule 48(a) drew sharp criticism from prosecutors, and therefore was modified to its present form
• stating that the initial version of Rule 48(a) drew sharp criticism from prosecutors, and therefore was modified to its present form
• stating that the initial version of Rule 48(a) drew sharp criticism from prosecutors, and therefore was modified to its present form
• holding trial court erred by denying government's motion to dismiss because government acted in good faith in moving to dismiss based on defendants' cooperation in providing evidence against leaders of drug-smuggling conspiracy
• holding trial court erred by denying government’s motion to dismiss because government acted in good faith in moving to dismiss based on defendants’ cooperation in providing evidence against leaders of drug-smuggling conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).