City of Mankato v. Fetchenhier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing “lewd exhibition of the genitals” under Minn. Stat. § 609.3451, subd. 1(2)
• rejecting defendant’s vagueness challenge to statute because defendant could have had no reasonable doubt that fondling a woman’s thigh and buttocks as she bent down to examine merchandise at a store amounted to “open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior” or “public indecency”
• rejecting defendant's vagueness challenge to statute because defendant could have had no reasonable doubt that fondling a woman's thigh and buttocks as she bent down to examine merchandise at a store amounted to \open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior\ or \public indecency\
• rejecting defendant’s vagueness challenge to statute because defendant could have had no reasonable doubt that fondling a woman’s thigh and buttocks as she bent down to examine merchandise at a store amounted to “open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior” or “public indecency”
• rejecting defendant’s vagueness challenge to statute because defendant could have had no reasonable doubt that fondling a woman’s thigh and buttocks as she bent down to examine merchandise at a store amounted to “open or gross lewdness or lascivious behavior” or “public indecency”
• “The commonly accepted definition of lewdness is the quality of being openly lustful or indecent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).