· 2/8/1911
City of Louisville v. Uebelhor
Citations
- 142 Ky. 151
- 134 S.W. 152
- 1911 Ky. LEXIS 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff failed to show an inference of discrimination because there was no indication of animus and no defendant had ever made any discriminatory comments to the plaintiff
- “The most significant undisputed fact is Plaintiff's admission that neither individual Defendant ever made a derogatory statement to him about his race.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.