Skip to main content
· 2/8/1911

City of Louisville v. Uebelhor

Citations

  • 142 Ky. 151
  • 134 S.W. 152
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff failed to show an inference of discrimination because there was no indication of animus and no defendant had ever made any discriminatory comments to the plaintiff
  • “The most significant undisputed fact is Plaintiff's admission that neither individual Defendant ever made a derogatory statement to him about his race.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.