City of Louisville v. Schnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court would not consider evidence outside of the administrative record, because the evidence the Plaintiff sought to introduce purportedly “challenge[d] the merits of [the decision-maker’s] determination,” and was therefore inappropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).