City of Lima v. Cramer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a motion 5 to dismiss was not warranted where the summons incorrectly stated how many days the defendant 6 had to answer the complaint
• reasoning that dismissal “is generally not justified absent a showing of prejudice”
• “Rule 4 is a flexible rule that should be liberally 21 construed so long as a party receives sufficient notice of the complaint.”
• summons fails to name all defendants or specifies incorrect time for filing of answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).