City of Laurel v. Upton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reports, letters and the opinion of another doctor upon which an expert relied in reaching his opinion are admissable and the expert may be cross-examined thereto
• holding that reports, letters and the opinion of another doctor upon which an expert relied in reaching his opinion are admissable and the expert may be cross-examined thereto
• holding defendants had the right to cross-examine plaintiff’s medical expert about basing his opinion in part on another doctor’s report
• \In every case where an expert witness is allowed to express an opinion such witness is subject to cross-examination as to the basis of his opinion.\
• “In every case where an expert witness is allowed to express an opinion such witness is subject to cross-examination as to the basis of his opinion.”
• possible error waived for failure to make argument in support of the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).