City of L.A. v. L.A. Farming & Milling Co.
Citations
- 152 Cal. 645
Syllabus
<p>Action to Determine Water-Eights—Submission upon Stipulated Facts—Additional Findings—Support op Judgment—Harmless Error.—Where an action to determine water-rights is submitted upon stipulated facts showing that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment, the making of additional findings by the court is unnecessary, and if it be erroneous, the error is harmless, where the additional findings do not materially change the stipulated facts.</p> <p>Id.—Eights op Los Angeles in Eiver as Successor op Pueblo— Biparian Eights Subordinate.—The rights of the city of Los Angeles in the Los Angeles Eiver for the use of its inhabitants, as successor of the old pueblo, is paramount in the whole body of the stream; and all rights of riparian owners on that river, are subordinate to the rights of the city therein.</p> <p>Id.—Confirmation and Patent op Pueblo “Land”—Water-Bights not Barred—Part op “Land”—Law op Locality.—The obtaining by the city of Los Angeles, which was incorporated in 1850, of a confirmation and patent for the pueblo land, under the act of Congress of March 3, 1851, “to ascertain and settle private land claims in California,” without any mention of “water-rights” in the proceedings, does not establish an adjudication barring the water-rights of the city in the Los Angeles Biver as the successor of the pueblo whose rights therein were part of the “land” by the law of the locality.</p> <p>Id.—Construction op Act op Congress—“Land” Only Contemplated.—The act of Congress of March 3, 1851, was intended to segregate private from public “land,” no word being used therein to designate property other than “land.” No claimant of “land” thereunder was required to set up in the petition to the commissioners any claim to “water-rights,” riparian or otherwise, but the claimant was entitled, under the confirmation and patent, to everything embraced in the word “land” used therein, by the general law applicable to the locality of the land, which may be essentially different in di
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.