Skip to main content
· 8/2/2005

City of King City v. Community Bank of Central

Citations

  • 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 384
  • 131 Cal. App. 4th 913
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6847
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 9344
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The requirement of a ‘recorded vote’ in [the statute] is no doubt intended to ensure some measure of accountability on the part of local legislators who approve (or refuse to approve) expenditures of public funds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rushing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.