City of Kent v. Berg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “appellate review presupposes that a litigant’s arguments have been raised and considered in the trial court”
• holding that Plank forfeited the opportunity for a hearing to develop his constitutional challenges where he did not preserve his claim
• concluding that Plank forfeited opportunity for evidentiary hearing on his constitutional challenge to Medical Malpractice Act damages cap
• noting that “[d]eclining to review an issue not properly preserved for review is essentially a ‘cardinal principal of sound judicial administration’”
• explaining that \appellate courts are not prohibited from considering the constitutionality of a statute even though the issue otherwise has been waived\
• noting that declining to review issues not properly preserved for appeal is a cardinal principle of sound judicial administration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).