City of Kansas v. Kansas City, Topeka & Western Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a car manufacturer could assert the plaintiffs misconduct as an affirmative defense in a strict products liability case
• jury instruction that no design defect exists if “a warning was present and effective to avoid that unreasonable danger”
• “Clear and intelligible jury instructions are particularly important to explain complex or confusing legal concepts.”
• “It is settled law in New Hampshire that strict liability for product defect includes manufacturing defect, design defect, and warning defect.”
• “It is settled law in New Hampshire that strict liability for product defect includes manufacturing defect, design defect, and warning defect.”
• \We adopted the doctrine of strict products liability as expressed in the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 402-A (1965) in Buttrick v . Lessard.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).