City of Jacksonville v. Horn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to demonstrate use, the parties must show “(1) use by the public, (2) the identity of the roadway, its location, width, length, and (3) that the use was adverse, in the sense that (for road purposes
• stating that section 712.03(5) evidences “the intent to preserve a public easement or right-of-way to its full width, notwithstanding the use of only a part of its width as designated by the conveyance, dedication, or other means by which it was established”
• MRTA used to extinguish unrecorded public right of way that had never been used

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).