Skip to main content
· 4/5/1985

City of Jackson v. Morley

Citations

  • 606 F. Supp. 434
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that timeliness of independent per quod claim could depend on spouse’s discovery of relevant facts, if separate and independent
  • reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment based on the statute of limitations and stating that the jury and not the court was the- proper body to draw inferences as to the plaintiff's state of mind
  • “The purpose of the rule is to eliminate a trial in cases where it is unnecessary and would only cause delay and expense.”
  • “The purpose of the rule is to eliminate a trial in cases where it is unnecessary and would only cause delay and expense.”
  • § 2A:14-2 “covers all personal injury claims,” including negligence and breach of warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.