City of Jackson v. Lumpkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding strict compliance is the standard for Section 11-46-11
• holding 11- 46-11 is to be strictly complied with
• incorrectly holding that the notice requirements are jurisdictional; correctly holding that such requirements are not simply \directive\
• incorrectly holding that the notice requirements are jurisdictional; correctly holding that such requirements are not simply “directive”
• “Lumpkin offers a number of arguments as to why this non-compliance [i.e., with Sections 11-46-11(1)-(2
• incorrectly holding that the notice requirements are jurisdictional; correctly holding that such requirements are not simply “directive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).