City of Jackson v. JACKSON OAKS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred by failing to treat a party’s post- judgment motion, which was filed after the time limitation to file a Rule 59(e) motion, as a Rule 60(b) motion
• holding that the trial court erred by failing to treat a party's post-judgment motion, which was filed after the time limitation to file a Rule 59(e) motion, as a Rule 60(b) motion
• holding that the trial court erred by failing to treat a party’s post- judgment motion, which was filed after the time limitation to file a Rule 59(e) motion, as a Rule 60(b) motion
• finding a Rule 59(e) motion filed twelve days after the final judgment was untimely and must be treated as a Rule 60(b) motion
• finding a Rule 59(e) motion filed twelve days after the final judgment was untimely and must be treated as a Rule 60(b) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).