Skip to main content
· 6/1/1982

City of Issaquah v. King County Water District No. 82

Citations

  • 31 Wash. App. 1093

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where parties did not dispute permanency disposition, new judgment specify- ing that DHS did not make reasonable efforts was necessary on remand “because changing the reasonable efforts con- clusion has collateral consequences regardless of whether the approved plan is changed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.