City of Indianapolis v. Kahlo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that citizens of Indianapolis were third-party beneficiaries of contract that required a portion of the Pan Am Plaza to remain open to the public
• “The original covenanters’ intent must be determined from the specific language used and the situation as it existed at the time the covenant was made.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).