City of Huntington Woods v. City of Detroit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “put interpretation of a finely-tuned regulatory scheme squarely in the hands of private parties and some 700 federal district judges, instead of in the hands of the Commission.”
• \To imply a private right of action runs counter to this centralization of function and to the development of a coherent national communications policy.\
• violation of substantive regulation does not violate § 276; silent as to § 201(b)
• “To imply a private right of action runs counter to this centralization of function and to the development of a coherent national communications policy.”
• violation of substantive regulation does not violate §276; silent as to § 201(b)
• “It is axiomatic that private rights of action must be created by Congress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).